Why Tokenizing Commodity Fails

Tokenization has become a popular way of creating digital assets that can be traded on blockchain platforms. However, tokenizing commodities has not been as successful as some had hoped. Tokenization involves the creation of digital tokens that represent assets such as commodities, stocks, or real estate. These tokens can then be traded on blockchain platforms, providing a decentralized way of exchanging assets.

The idea of tokenizing commodities seemed attractive because it would allow for the fractional ownership of assets that were previously only available to large investors. However, the reality has been different. Tokenizing commodities has been difficult because of the unique characteristics of these assets. Commodities are physical assets that have to be stored and transported, which makes it difficult to create a digital representation that accurately reflects the value of the underlying asset. Additionally, commodities have complex supply chains that involve multiple parties, making it difficult to create a transparent and secure system for tokenizing them.

Fundamentals of Tokenization

Definition of Tokenization

Tokenization is the process of converting an asset or commodity into a digital token that can be traded on a blockchain network. This process involves breaking down the asset into smaller units, which are then represented by tokens. These tokens can be bought, sold, and traded like any other asset on a blockchain network.

Tokenization has become increasingly popular in recent years, as it allows for the fractional ownership of assets. This means that investors can purchase a small portion of an asset, rather than having to buy the entire asset outright. This has made it easier for investors to diversify their portfolios and gain exposure to a wider range of assets.

Purpose of Tokenizing Commodities

The purpose of tokenizing commodities is to make the trading of these assets more efficient and accessible. By tokenizing commodities, investors can trade them on a blockchain network, which provides a secure and transparent platform for buying and selling assets.

Tokenization also makes it easier to track the ownership and transfer of commodities. This is because each token represents a specific portion of the commodity, and ownership of that token can be easily transferred from one party to another.

However, despite its potential benefits, tokenizing commodities has not been as successful as some had hoped. There are several reasons for this, including the fact that commodities are physical assets, and their value is often influenced by external factors such as weather patterns and geopolitical events.

Additionally, the liquidity of tokenized commodities can be limited, as there may not be enough buyers and sellers in the market to support a robust trading environment. This can result in low trading volumes and wider bid-ask spreads, which can make it difficult for investors to buy and sell tokens at fair prices.

In summary, while tokenization has the potential to revolutionize the way we trade commodities, there are still several challenges that need to be addressed before it can become a mainstream practice.

Economic Challenges

Market Volatility

Tokenizing commodities has been touted as a way to provide investors with a new way to invest in commodities. However, one of the biggest challenges facing tokenized commodities is market volatility. Commodities markets are notoriously volatile, and this volatility can be exacerbated by the use of tokens.

Tokenizing commodities can make it easier for investors to buy and sell commodities, but it can also make it easier for speculators to enter the market. This can lead to increased volatility, which can be harmful to both investors and producers. In addition, tokenized commodities can be traded 24/7, which can lead to increased volatility as traders react to news and events around the clock.

Price Discovery Issues

Another challenge facing tokenized commodities is price discovery. Price discovery is the process by which the market determines the value of a commodity. In traditional commodities markets, price discovery is achieved through the interaction of buyers and sellers. However, in tokenized commodity markets, price discovery can be more difficult.

Tokenized commodities can be traded on multiple exchanges, which can lead to price discrepancies. In addition, the lack of regulation in tokenized commodity markets can make it difficult to ensure that prices are based on actual supply and demand. This can lead to price manipulation and other issues that can harm investors and producers alike.

Overall, while tokenizing commodities may seem like a promising idea, there are significant economic challenges that must be addressed before tokenized commodities can become a viable investment option. Investors should carefully consider these challenges before investing in tokenized commodities.

Regulatory and Legal Barriers

Compliance with Securities Law

One of the main regulatory barriers to tokenizing commodities is compliance with securities law. The laws governing securities are complex and vary from country to country, making it difficult for commodity token issuers to navigate the legal landscape.

In many jurisdictions, tokens that represent commodities may be considered securities, which means that they must comply with securities laws and regulations. This can be a time-consuming and expensive process, as issuers must register their tokens with regulatory bodies and ensure that they are in compliance with all relevant regulations.

Furthermore, securities laws often require issuers to disclose detailed information about their operations and financial performance, which can be difficult for commodity producers to provide. This may make it difficult for smaller producers to tokenize their commodities, as they may not have the resources to comply with these requirements.

Jurisdictional Differences

Another regulatory barrier to tokenizing commodities is the differences in regulations between jurisdictions. While some countries may have clear regulations governing the issuance of commodity tokens, others may have little or no regulation in place.

This can create a situation where issuers are unsure of how to proceed, as they may not know which regulations apply to their tokens. Additionally, even if an issuer is able to comply with regulations in one jurisdiction, they may find it difficult to expand into other markets due to differences in regulations.

In some cases, issuers may be required to obtain licenses or approvals from multiple regulatory bodies in order to operate in different jurisdictions. This can be a time-consuming and expensive process, and may make it difficult for smaller issuers to expand into new markets.

Overall, the regulatory and legal barriers to tokenizing commodities are significant, and may make it difficult for issuers to achieve widespread adoption of their tokens. As such, it is important for issuers to carefully consider these barriers before deciding to tokenize their commodities.

Technical Limitations

Blockchain Scalability

One of the main technical limitations of tokenizing commodities on a blockchain is scalability. Blockchain technology is still in its early stages, and it has yet to reach the level of scalability required to handle large volumes of commodity transactions. As the number of transactions increases, the blockchain becomes congested, causing delays and increasing transaction fees. This scalability issue can be a significant hurdle for the tokenization of commodities, which often involve high volumes of transactions.

Interoperability Concerns

Another technical limitation of tokenizing commodities on a blockchain is interoperability. Different blockchains have varying levels of compatibility, which can lead to difficulties in integrating different systems. This can be a significant problem for the tokenization of commodities, which require interoperability between different blockchains to function effectively.

To overcome these technical limitations, developers are exploring various solutions, including the use of off-chain transactions, layer-two scaling solutions, and the development of new blockchain architectures. However, these solutions are still in their early stages, and it may be some time before they are widely adopted.

In the meantime, it is important to recognize the technical limitations of tokenizing commodities on a blockchain and to consider alternative solutions that may be more suitable for managing commodity transactions.

Tokenization Ecosystem Complexity

Tokenizing commodities is a complex process that involves various stakeholders, including regulators, exchanges, traders, and investors. The ecosystem’s complexity is one of the main reasons why tokenizing commodities doesn’t work. Here are two major factors that contribute to this complexity:

Infrastructure Readiness

Tokenizing commodities requires a robust infrastructure that can handle the issuance, trading, and settlement of tokens. This infrastructure should be able to handle large volumes of transactions, ensure security and transparency, and comply with regulatory requirements. Unfortunately, the current infrastructure is not ready to handle such complex operations.

For instance, most commodity exchanges lack the necessary technology to support tokenization. They also lack the expertise to handle the legal and regulatory aspects of tokenization. This makes it difficult to integrate tokenization into the existing commodity trading ecosystem. Additionally, the lack of standardization in the tokenization process makes it hard to ensure interoperability and compatibility between different systems.

Stakeholder Acceptance

Tokenizing commodities requires the acceptance of various stakeholders, including regulators, exchanges, traders, and investors. Each stakeholder has different interests and concerns, which can make it hard to achieve consensus on the tokenization process.

Regulators, for instance, are concerned about the legal and regulatory implications of tokenization. They want to ensure that tokenization complies with existing laws and regulations, such as anti-money laundering and know-your-customer regulations. Exchanges, on the other hand, are concerned about the impact of tokenization on their business models. They want to ensure that tokenization doesn’t disrupt their existing operations or reduce their revenue streams.

Traders and investors are concerned about the liquidity and price stability of tokenized commodities. They want to ensure that tokenization doesn’t lead to price volatility or illiquidity. They also want to ensure that tokenization doesn’t expose them to additional risks, such as cyber attacks or fraud. Achieving stakeholder acceptance is critical for the success of tokenizing commodities. However, this is a challenging task that requires significant effort and resources.

Risk Management

Counterparty Risks

One of the main challenges of tokenizing commodities is the counterparty risks associated with the transactions. When trading commodities, there is always a risk that the counterparty may default on their obligations, leading to financial losses for the other party. This risk is amplified when trading commodities through tokens, as the lack of a central authority makes it difficult to monitor and regulate transactions.

Moreover, the use of smart contracts to automate transactions may not always be foolproof, and there is a risk of bugs or coding errors that could lead to unintended consequences. In such cases, it may be difficult to recover the lost funds, leading to financial losses for the parties involved.

Operational Security

Another challenge in tokenizing commodities is ensuring operational security. The use of blockchain technology and smart contracts may enhance security by providing a tamper-proof and transparent ledger of transactions. However, there is always a risk of cyber attacks and hacking attempts that could compromise the security of the system.

To mitigate these risks, it is essential to implement robust security protocols and ensure that all parties involved in the transactions are aware of their responsibilities. This may include the use of multi-factor authentication, encryption, and regular security audits to identify and address vulnerabilities in the system.

In summary, while tokenizing commodities may offer several benefits, it is essential to be aware of the associated risks and take appropriate measures to mitigate them. By implementing robust risk management strategies, it may be possible to minimize the risks and maximize the potential benefits of tokenizing commodities.

Case Studies of Failed Attempts

Analysis of Specific Failures

Tokenizing commodities has been attempted in various industries, but the results have been far from successful. Here are some examples:


In 2018, a coffee token called “Bext360” was launched with the aim of improving transparency and traceability in the coffee supply chain. However, the token failed to gain traction due to several factors. Firstly, the token was not backed by any physical coffee, making it difficult for investors to understand its value. Secondly, the token’s use case was limited to a specific platform, making it less accessible to the wider market. Finally, the token’s technical implementation was found to be lacking, with issues around scalability and security.


In 2018, a diamond token called “CARAT” was launched with the aim of providing investors with a way to invest in diamonds without having to physically own them. However, the token failed to gain traction due to several factors. Firstly, the diamond industry is already highly regulated and transparent, making the token’s value proposition less compelling. Secondly, the token’s technical implementation was found to be lacking, with issues around scalability and security.


In 2019, an oil token called “Petro” was launched by the Venezuelan government with the aim of circumventing US sanctions and raising funds for the country’s struggling economy. However, the token was widely criticized for being a political stunt rather than a legitimate investment opportunity. The token was also found to be technically flawed, with issues around scalability and security.

These case studies illustrate the challenges of tokenizing commodities. While the idea of creating a digital representation of a physical asset may seem appealing, the reality is that it is difficult to implement in practice. Investors need to have a clear understanding of the underlying asset’s value, and the token needs to be technically sound and accessible to the wider market. Without these factors in place, tokenizing commodities is unlikely to succeed.

Future Outlook

Potential Solutions

Despite the challenges associated with tokenizing commodities, there are potential solutions that could be explored. One potential solution is to develop more sophisticated smart contracts that can account for the complexities of commodity trading. These smart contracts could be designed to automatically adjust prices based on market conditions, or to incorporate more nuanced delivery terms.

Another potential solution is to develop new financial instruments that can be used to trade commodities in a tokenized format. For example, it may be possible to create a new type of derivative that is based on a tokenized commodity. This derivative could be designed to provide exposure to the underlying commodity, while also incorporating the benefits of tokenization.

Emerging Trends

Despite the challenges associated with tokenizing commodities, there are several emerging trends that could help to drive adoption in the future. One of these trends is the growing interest in sustainable and ethical sourcing. As consumers become more concerned about the environmental and social impact of their purchases, there may be increased demand for tokenized commodities that can provide greater transparency and traceability.

Another emerging trend is the use of blockchain technology to create decentralized marketplaces. These marketplaces could be used to trade tokenized commodities in a peer-to-peer fashion, without the need for intermediaries. This could help to reduce transaction costs and increase efficiency, while also providing greater access to commodity markets for smaller players.

Overall, while there are certainly challenges associated with tokenizing commodities, there are also potential solutions and emerging trends that could help to drive adoption in the future. By continuing to innovate and explore new possibilities, it may be possible to overcome these challenges and unlock the benefits of tokenization for the commodity markets.

Share this post



*The brochure will be sent to your email after clicking on ‘Download’